In Fall 2010, UC Irvine piloted AP Review, a system which routes academic personnel review files electronically. This review system was developed by UC San Diego and shared with UC Irvine as part of a two campus collaboration to share AP systems. UCSD piloted this system in 2009-10 and currently processes their dean delegated and CAP-reviewed merits using AP Review. In exchange for AP Review, UC Irvine shared Recruit with UCSD and UCSD now utilizes Recruit for their faculty recruitment.
UC Irvine’s 2010-11 pilot processed fifteen faculty merit files using AP Review, including three files reviewed by the Council on Academic Personnel (CAP). Eight departments, representing seven schools/units, participated in the pilot. Due to the success of the pilot and the support and feedback from our pilot users, AP Review was adopted as the campus AP Review System starting the 2011-12 review year.
Some key features of AP Review include:
- Routes the file electronically, from uploading file preparation documents to final decision notification
- Enables candidates and all reviewers to review the file in a bundled PDF online (via secure login), with bookmark functionality to locate documents easily
- Provides system generated email notifications to users, prompting them to take action
- Creates and processes candidate certifications electronically
- Creates a transparent tracking system of the movement of the file
- Provides access to records
For more information on AP Review, including a five minute overview of the system, please visit our Resources section. If you have any questions or comments about AP Review, please contact our AP Review team at: firstname.lastname@example.org.
News and Updates
Corrections at the Department Level Made Simpler
This enhancement makes it a lot easier for departments to make changes/corrections to the file after the Dean’s Office returns it (prior to any review by CAP). Previously, the system would force the department to re-engage voting faculty and/or the candidate when corrections were minor or did not merit re-review of the file. This new feature will give departments the ability to decide whether or not to notify the voting faculty when a change to the file has been made (the candidate will still have to re-certify in some cases).
Here are the scenarios to outline the new feature:
Scenario 1: Add/Change/Delete Files in File Prep
Candidate will have to re-certify
Notify voting faculty for departmental review (optional)
Scenario 2: Changes to Vote, Proposed Status
Once the vote and/or proposed status has been revised, the department staff can forward the file to the dean
Scenario 3: Replacing Department letter or adding/replacing dissenting letters
Candidate will have to re-certify
Notify voting faculty to review department recommendation letter (optional)
Scenario 4: Replacing/Adding Chair’s independent letter
Once the chair’s letter has been uploaded, the department staff can forward the file to the Dean
Also included in this release:
- Updated alert messages to help department staff navigate through the system easily.
- Review of the final departmental letter by the voting faculty is now optional
New Signature Option
Users now have the option of uploading signed letters and can choose to move the file forward without requesting an electronic signature from the authority role (Chair, Dean, etc.). The option to have the authority role electronically sign is still available for those who choose to continue to use it.
Mid Career Assessments and Edit Data
Mid Career Assessment (MCA) votes can now be recorded in the system (MCA letters should be uploaded with the Department Recommendation Letter).
Dean’s Offices now have the ability to correct errors in the Proposed Status data, reducing the need to return the file back to the department for corrections.